Abraham Maslows Hierarchy of Needs :: Psychology Sociology Maslow Essays

Abraham Maslows Hierarchy of NeedsAbraham Maslow is known for establishing the theory of a hierarchy of needs, writing that human beings atomic number 18 motivated by unsatisfied needs, and that certain lower needs need to be satisfied before higher needs can be satisfied. Maslow analyse exemplary passel such as Albert Einstein, Jane Addams, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Frederick Douglas rather than mentally sickish or neurotic people. This was a radical departure from two of the chief schools of psychology of his day Freud and B.F. Skinner. Freud cut little difference between the motivations of humans and animals. We atomic number 18 supposedly rational beings however, we do not act that way. Such pessimism, Maslow believed, was the result of Freuds news report of mentally ill people. The study of crippled, stunted, immature, and unhealthy specimens can yield only a cripple psychology and a cripple philosophy (Motivation and Personality). Skinner, on the diverse hand, studied ho w pigeons and sporty rats learn. His motivational models were based on simple rewards such as food and water, sex, and avoidance of pain. Say sit to your frump and give the dog a speak when it sits, and-after several repetitions--the dog will sit when you command it to do so. Maslow thought that psychologists should instead study the playfulness, affection, etc., of animals. He also believed that Skinner discounted things that take shape humans different from each other. Instead, Skinner relied on statistical descriptions of people. Maslows hierarchy of needs was an alternative to the depressing determinism of Freud and Skinner. He felt that people are essentially trustworthy, self-protecting, and self-governing. Humans slope toward growth and love. Although there is a continuous cycle of human wars, murder, deceit, etc., he believed that violence is not what human nature is meant to be like. power and other evils move on when human needs are thwarted. In other words, people who are deprived of lower needs such as condom may act themselves by violent means. He did not believe that humans are violent because they enjoy violence. Or that they lie, cheat, and steal because they enjoy doing it. match to Maslow, there are general types of needs (physiological, safety, love, and esteem) that must be satisfied before a person can act unselfishly. He called these needs deprivation needs. As commodious as we are motivated to satisfy these cravings, we are moving towards growth, toward self-actualization. Satisfying needs is healthy blocking gratification makes us demented or evil.Abraham Maslows Hierarchy of Needs Psychology Sociology Maslow EssaysAbraham Maslows Hierarchy of NeedsAbraham Maslow is known for establishing the theory of a hierarchy of needs, writing that human beings are motivated by unsatisfied needs, and that certain lower needs need to be satisfied before higher needs can be satisfied. Maslow studied exemplary people such as Albert Ein stein, Jane Addams, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Frederick Douglas rather than mentally ill or neurotic people. This was a radical departure from two of the chief schools of psychology of his day Freud and B.F. Skinner. Freud saw little difference between the motivations of humans and animals. We are supposedly rational beings however, we do not act that way. Such pessimism, Maslow believed, was the result of Freuds study of mentally ill people. The study of crippled, stunted, immature, and unhealthy specimens can yield only a cripple psychology and a cripple philosophy (Motivation and Personality). Skinner, on the other hand, studied how pigeons and white rats learn. His motivational models were based on simple rewards such as food and water, sex, and avoidance of pain. Say sit to your dog and give the dog a treat when it sits, and-after several repetitions--the dog will sit when you command it to do so. Maslow thought that psychologists should instead study the playfulness, affection, e tc., of animals. He also believed that Skinner discounted things that make humans different from each other. Instead, Skinner relied on statistical descriptions of people. Maslows hierarchy of needs was an alternative to the depressing determinism of Freud and Skinner. He felt that people are basically trustworthy, self-protecting, and self-governing. Humans tend toward growth and love. Although there is a continuous cycle of human wars, murder, deceit, etc., he believed that violence is not what human nature is meant to be like. Violence and other evils occur when human needs are thwarted. In other words, people who are deprived of lower needs such as safety may defend themselves by violent means. He did not believe that humans are violent because they enjoy violence. Or that they lie, cheat, and steal because they enjoy doing it. According to Maslow, there are general types of needs (physiological, safety, love, and esteem) that must be satisfied before a person can act unselfishl y. He called these needs deficiency needs. As long as we are motivated to satisfy these cravings, we are moving towards growth, toward self-actualization. Satisfying needs is healthy blocking gratification makes us sick or evil.

Essay --

A common meta-narrative surrounding the American Civil War deals with each sides motivation for fighting the North fought to exert the Union, while the Confederacy fought to preserve states rights, which tends to deemphasize the role that role racial slavery played in the nations recital. In addition, when slavery is discussed, it is removed from political discussion and the North is ofttimes glorified for fighting for black American interests, eventually minimizing the racial tension that fraught the United States, in both the North and South. This paper will good describe the non-racial knowledge that has been subjugated around the Civil War, connect this knowledge to the grand narrative of this nations history, and discuss how it problematizes general knowledge by deemphasizing its significance in Americas history, ultimately outlining that ignorance of race relations in this country has only led to more racial tension.First, analyzing the story behind the Northern and Southern motivation for the warfare shines light on how and why the knowledge subjugated around the Civil War commonly minimizes issues like slavery and racism. Deemphasizing slavery by focusing history on the idea that the North fought to keep states united and that the South seceded in the name of states rights does two important things. First, it diminishes the role racism played in American history and it also allows racism to be hidden behind states rights rather than discussed in honest terms. The North did fight for unison among states, scarce such unity called for an economy that did not rely on slave labor (Zinn 177). The South did secede claiming states rights, but those rights were to own property as they wished, that is to say human beings ... ...ended but race discrimination is an issue that is still going on in this country. Racism has been significantly reduced but unfortunately many individuals still expect to face this problem. African Americans are not the only individu als that are affected by racism today. Individuals of many other races are also affected by this issue The struggle over racial slavery may be the predominant theme in American history (Loewen 137) and should not be unheeded or downplayed in any degree. Although the causes of racism are a complicated historical issue, it is important to understand the dynamic interplay between slavery as a socioeconomic system and racism as the overlying ideological system (Loewen 143). The ideological system of racism has long outlived the socioeconomic system of slavery (Loewen 144) and acquisition from history in this way helps to prevent repetition of it.